Statement by Margaret Hosty, co-plaintiff, June 20, 2005

Understandably, I am dismayed by the court's opinion, and find it troubling and grossly flawed; it demonstrates a considerably deficient comprehension on the part of the majority of the appellate judges of the allegations, university policy, deposed statements, material documents, and timeline of events evidenced by said items, which might be why the court reached such an erroneous decision. Doubtless, if the court's decision is permitted to stand, the results will be disastrous for adult students in any expressive venue who might clash with prurient or political administrative interests. Regardless of our pro se status, my coplaintiffs and I are resolved to appeal to the nation's highest court.